Skip to main content

The Unreasonable Evaluator

Vector pop art surprised housewife with open mouth Free Vector

I talked to an evaluator of one language school. She's the one who interviews applicants and after the applicant's demo class, she decides whether that applicant shoul be hired or not. The evaluator rejected an applicant with 14 years of experience in the ESL industry, and the applicant was herself a trainer in a the very first man to man language school for Japanese professionals in the Philippines.

I asked her why she rejected the applicant.

She said that tha applicant corrected the student's pronunciation. According to the evaluator, it seemed that the applicant could not stand the wrong pronunciation of the student that's why she, the applicant, kept on asking the student to produce the right sound.

I asked the evaluator why it was wrong for the applicant to correct the student's pronunciation. She said that it's innate for Japanese students to talk that way. Instead, the applicant should just have let the student talk.

Really?! Seriously, Ms. Evaluator?!

My arguments:

If it's not okay for a teacher to correct the student's mistake in the basic sounds, then of what good is paying the school a lot of money? If the school's policy is just to let the students talk their own way, then why, in the first place, would a student want to enroll in an English language school?

The student will learn new words. Fine. He may even learn new ways to express an idea. Fine. But, if the student talks and no one can  understand what he is talking about because of his bad accent and pronunciation, then of what use are the new words and expression?

Credit: Google Translate

本当に?!真剣に、Ms Evaluator ?!



Popular posts from this blog

Five Advantages of Studying at ACERS



First, we have a systematic and scientific curriculum which is flexible and thus can be customized depending on the English level and purpose of the student.

Second, we have teachers here whose teaching skills have been tried, tested and proven to be effective through the years.They can teach anything to anybody. Just check their TOEIC scores, and I need not explain why.  (I am taking the TOEIC exam in December, by the way.^^)

(The school owner teaching a student using the Integrated Method) 

Third, the owners of this school did not just wake up one day and suddenly decided to set up a school. So, the immediate target of this school is to give quality English education to Japanese nationals and in the long run, improve the image of the Philippines in the world. You see, not even our closest Asian neighbors know that English is our second language here, nor do they know that we teach English here.

Fourth, we have a support class. My Japanese staff, an MBA st…

TOEIC and Speaking


Myth: A person with a high TOEIC score, especially when it's over 900,  is a very good English speaker.
Reality: There are people whose TOEIC scores are really  high but can't speak English fluently. 
Conclusion: Just because a person has a high TOEIC score doesn't mean that he can speak English well. A high TOEIC score, therefore, is not the ultimate barometer of a person's English skills.
Question: So, why is it that here at ACERS, we train students to achieve a satisfactory TOEIC score? 
Answer:  This is because in Japan and in Korea, one's English ability is based on his TOEIC score. As I mentioned above, however, this is a myth and  it isn't what happens in reality.
One Korean student told me long time ago that  in their country, a person whose TOEIC score is lower than 900 should not even think about applying for a job. This is because small and big Korean companies alike entertain only those whose scores are 900 and above. I'm sure that t…

Drink Soup or Eat Soup?


One student asked me why  we say "eat soup" in English, and not "drink soup". In Japanese, they say "drink soup".

The truth is, there's no grammar rule involved in this. It's just a matter of the speaker's preference. However, it is more appropriate to say "eat soup" because of several reasons. Let's start with the obvious:  First, soup is served in a bowl.--not from a drinking glass or cup, so we don't drink it. 

Second, we use a spoon or chopsticks  to put the soup into our mouths. We don't drink it the way we drink water or beer from a glass or mug.

The same student argued that soup is liquid, so it's more appropriate to drink it instead of to eat it. Oh yeah, he's got a point, but let's remember that soup is food, so we eat it. It's not a beverage like Coke or beer or juice, and this brings me back to my point that it is not served in a drinking glass.  

Third, soup is not just plain liqui…